Thursday, October 01, 2009

Ubiquitous poverty

There are moments where I get these sudden enlightening thoughts, atleast, that’s how I would like to view it… One such thought came to my mind today. What if majority of the people in the world are poorer? Think about it… Like the way it was as I grew up. We couldn’t afford a car or the likes of a motor bike. Almost, everyone had to commute through public transportation for long distances. For shorter distances, it was mostly a walk. Even bicycle was a luxury. No need for an expensive gym or a treadmill… No threat of fuel consumption exploding….

All papers and plastics (milk covers) were exchanged for money. A great way to recycle plastics, papers and old utensils. Since there was money involved, no one threw their stuff away. Throwing garbage was not a weekly chore as it is now. Even the stuff that came out of cooking, like egg shells, tea and coffee powder, drumstick fibers etc were all thrown in the garden to enrich soil.

If people had less money, eating habits definitely change. You eat what you need, than whatever you can. To cut down costs, everybody will start farming plants and vegetables in their own backyard, which means that eating fresh vegetables becomes a day to day affair. Organic too… Buying new clothes is a calendered event. One doesn’t buy what what one doesn’t need. Since there is always an uncertainty around job losses, the solution will depend on community. People living together, as a family or otherwise and support each other through their tough times…Ring a bell..;)

While the capitalistic world would scornfully ignore my thoughts as being stupid, may be even rightfully so, I like to think that I am just quoting history and not proposing something idealistic. When the whole world revolves around policies that should make people richer, my point is that, the world is probably better off if majority of people are poorer. There is always a question of who would these people work for and what will be the balance of wealth between different people, which, in turn, would again stir the conversation of imbalance. But, just the thought of poverty as a solution of the current conditions of global problems seemed interesting to me. Oh well, feel like going for a drive… May be, eat out and on the way back, have my preferred pearl tea. Oh, did I forget shopping for my supply of bottled water and canned soda… I can then catch up on the interesting discussions of global climate change that came up in the recent summit….:)

4 comments:

Meera Manohar said...

Ages since I visited am-kicking ( Survivor-- you reading this !? :-D

Very nice post Mindframes. Brought back fond memories of those good old days. Paal covers, newspapers, cans/bottles and what nots dumped into the laps of the way side vendor and asking my mom for a cut of the money she used to get out of it :-)

On the issue of poverty: A few of my colleagues & I recently went out to lunch with my ex-boss/colleagues husband. This couple moved back to India 2 years ago. My ex-boss was well known here in domestic violence circles as a revolutionary who brought in grant funding and policies et al for Human trafficking victims in the west coast.

Her husband was telling us that she works for UNICEF now based out of Pune,and has developed a program whereby she has transformed a small group of rag/paper picking homeless group of wome,n into an organization which is got a contract with the local government to pick paper/rags and recycle them. So, all of them are decently on their way out of poverty, have a decent reliable income, and more so have the backing of a few well known organizations in the community. Felt so elated & motivated to hear that piece of news!

I am sure, I digressed here, but was reminded of this when you talked about poverty :-)

Suresh Sankaralingam said...

Hey Meera, Thanks for your comment... That's an interesting piece of information about your friends in Pune...

srikrish said...

Interesting blog asusual!

"World is better off if majority of people are poorer"

- Poverty in my opinion is a relative term. In one place, you are poor if you use government provided food stamps to get your food. In other place, you are only poor, if you have nothing to eat for 2 days or so.

If you mean, we are all better off with lesser than what we have, then I tend to agree.

After my recent visit to UK & Sweden, I am thinking we are either one of the luckiest people OR one of the spoilt bunch (depends on where you stand and see).

Even in the western world, some of the comforts we take it for granted (in Bayarea/US)are not available.

They walk much more and eat much less. Both economy and social norms puts this restriction leading to less number of Obese people and less environment problems etc. (statisticians or wiki people.. please bear with me, I am talking about what I saw not the national average)

"Middle class" may be the solution.. ???

www.satu88.com said...

สล็อตออนไลน์
เกมส์สล็อต
slot online
คาสิโนออนไลน์
บาคาร่าออนไลน์
หวยออนไลน์
casino online