I watched Oscars like millions did. Some random points that came to mind: I did clap when Slumdog Millionaire reaped in the awards, but the logical side of me couldn't concede that the movie was worth 8 of them. I would call it a nice enough movie, but just that. Not great, not wonderful - tad better than mediocre. Another example of how right place at right time far outweighs merit.
And then, of course some "Body" comes along and does an illogical thing, and basks in the narrow glow of publicity it brings. They gifted the children a concrete house and claimed they are working for the upliftment of conditions in slums. My head reels - how?! By moving the children who already made some money to a concrete house? How does that equate to "working for upliftment of slums"?
I loved the way Danny Boyle jumped up and down like Tigger in Winnie The Pooh when he won his Oscar. It was a helpful reminder that we all have a child in us, and sometimes takes hard work finding it. I watched with amusement as the cameras rolled on the best dressed women. I couldn't help comparing the style to the women in South Indian villages who tie a hard knot with their "ull-paavadais" just covering their breasts and dropping down below their knees, as they took a bath in semi-privacy (a term used for not bathing in a closed bathroom - say at the well, or in the courtyard in their homes)"Ull-paavadai" is the inner skirt worn underneath a saree.
Almost all the dazzling clothes were of the same bathing-in-courtyard style, and most of the colours were the same tried and tested variety. But, speaking with a sense of negative fashion IQ , I am not the person most suited to make judgements I am afraid.
I scoured the crowd and found only 2 women wearing a pair of glasses, but the same was not true of Men. Are men more comfortable with glasses or are women more self-conscious about the bespectacled image?!
3 comments:
Don't be a meanie mom :)
Funny blog asusual..
It is amazing to see how different kids develop their artistic talents.
Since kids are sharp in getting their feedback (non verbal too), they tend to please the parent by doing what they like.
So, there is good corelation between how much their parents are interested in arts to their kids initial burst of talent.
@Brainwaves,
I am assuming you didn't mean this comment for this post..This is what happens when you try to comment for the same post at different blogs..You get confused with cut and paste..Ayyo...Oscar...kum, kids..kum, meanie mom..kum ennapa sambandham?
@ Saumya,
UllPavadai..is carrying it a bit too far..:-)though its novel. Some of the dresses were very nice. I just loved what Natalie Portman wore.As you said, right place at the right time...I guess we are noticing only this year , since the movie,though British is based in India.
Last year, the winner was "No country for old men" and I couldn't watch the latter half out of sheer disgust..( For those who liked that movie, this is just my opinion.)
Intended comment
---------------------
Women in movies are seen as a glamor components for most part.
Hence presenting themselves in "nice" clothes and showing off their body a bit is part of marketing.
With respect to all wearing similar dresses and colors, i wonder the same about style of cars. All cars have same exterior style (Vx Bug, Porsche and Corvettes are few exceptions).
Same applicable for fashion/style world wide.
I would say this movie is pretty decent one. Screenplay and Editing did the trick for the movie. And India, the country, helped as very "colorful" back drop in all sense.
Post a Comment